課程大綱

課程資訊

課程名稱

階級形構
Class Formation

開課學期

101-1

授課對象

社會科學院社會學研究所

授課教師

何明修

課號

Soc7125

課程識別碼

325 M0370

班次

學分

全/半年

半年

必/選修

選修

上課時間

星期一6,7,8(13:20~16:20)

上課地點

社112

備註

限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：10人

Ceiba 課程網頁

http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1011class

課程簡介影片

核心能力關聯

核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖

課程大綱

為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印

課程概述

在《共產主義宣言》中，馬克思在勾勒出當代階級政治的圖像。資本主義下，普羅大眾將會形成一個具有主體意識、集體行動力的群體(亦即所謂的“proletarians into a class”)，這個「階級形構」的過程將會重新塑造整體社會的新風貌。在馬克思的原初設想中，工人群眾的隊伍會越來越龐大，他們的地域、族群、技能的差異性將會縮小，各種新穎的傳播與組織媒介會強化他們的一致性，民主的參與管道會提升他們的政治意識，最後，批判知識份子的投靠也帶來強而有力的觀念引導，總體結果即是工人階級革命是不可避免的歷史趨勢。
從事後來看，馬克思的預言是錯誤的，歷史並不是按照他所設想的劇本演出；工人階級有可能展現出革命的熱忱，但是在更多時候，他們的集體行動卻是有更多元的形態。儘管如此，階級形構的歷史過程仍舊留下不可抹滅的影響，無論工人本身是否能夠集結成一股有意識的力量，都是值得我們探討的。。更重要地，階級形構在不同社會所採取的相異軌跡，也成為社會學家所關切的研究問題。為了解答馬克思所遺留下的巨大歷史猜測，許多研究者分別引援不同的理論取徑，使得更多與階級形構的種種因素獲得重視。

課程目標

本課程將以閱讀既有的英語的研究作品主。
我們希望能夠在掌握了古典與當代的各種研究取徑之後，最終能將這些研究成果用來思索台灣的階級形構過程。因此，在閱讀內容安排上，我們先著重於不同理論途徑的辯析，接下來則是探討若干與階級形構有關的文化與政治因素，最後則是歸結到本土的研究議題。

課程要求

這一門研究所的課程，除了講員授課以外，我期待學生自發性地提出問題，無論是針對講員的授課內容疑義，或是個人心得分享。主動提問與發表看法，不僅是學生的受教權益，也會影響課堂表現的分數。
口頭報告：指定讀物是每次授課的主要內容，希望學生能在上課前先抽空閱讀其內容。每週的讀物都要有學生負責口頭報告，並且準備簡單的書面內容。負責同學除了整理、說明讀物的內容主旨以外，更要加以評論、發表個人感想、並且彙整其他同學的隨堂心得。
隨堂心得：為了鼓勵所有同學事先閱讀的習慣，並且避免淪為只有負責口頭報告同學有讀的不良風氣。除了當週負責口頭報告的同學以外，其他上課同學都要在上課前一天21:00之前，撰寫一份不得超過300字的隨堂心得。其中需要包括兩個部分，(1)本週讀物的內容有那些啟發，可用於解釋何種現象，(2)本週讀物有那些內容是你不同意的，並且說明其理由。隨堂心得需要在指定時間前email給負責當週口頭報告的同學，逾時視為沒有繳交。口頭報告的同學也需將彙整這些心得，並且在課堂加以回應。
讀書心得：期中與期末有兩次的「讀書心得」，每次不得少於5,000字。其內容需要是與課程指定閱讀內容有關，或其運用延伸。如果內容是完全無關，或是利用其他問的課程之報告充數，我將不予接受。如果涉及抄襲，依校規處理。第一次讀書心得報告不得晚於11/1，第二次不得晚於1/1，請用email繳交。
本課程的上課講義會在帝宇影印店製作，請同學在第一次上課時登記份數，並且自行前往購買。帝宇是在辛亥路2段155號1樓(台大校園對面)，電話2736-8495。

預期每週課後學習時數

Office Hours

備註：週三上午10:00-12:00，請事先預約。

指定閱讀

見課程進度。*為指定閱讀內容，其他為參考內容

參考書目

見課程進度。*為指定閱讀內容，其他為參考內容

評量方式
(僅供參考)

No.	項目	百分比	說明
1.	口頭報告	20%
2.	課堂討論與參與	20%
3.	隨堂心得	30%
4.	兩次讀書心得報告	30%

課程進度

週次	日期	單元主題
第1週	2012/09/10	課程簡介
第2週	2012/09/17	古典觀點與後續的研究 Marx, Karl (1978) “The Communist Manifesto” in The Socialist Revolution. Moscow: Progress Publisher, pp.56-76. Katznelson, Ira (1986) “Working-Class Formation: Constructing Cases and Comparisons.” Pp. 3-41, in Working-class Formation: Nineteenth-century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, eds. by Ira Katznelson and Aristide R. Zolberg. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Calhoun, Craig (1982) The Question of Class Struggle: Social Foundations of Popular Radicalism during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hobsbawm, Eric (1984) Worker: Worlds of Labor. New York: Pantheon.
第3週	2012/09/24	例外主義(exceptionalism)的觀點 *Sombart, Werner (1976) Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? New York: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 3-58. Aronowitz, Stanley (1982) Working-Class Hero: A New Strategy for Labor. New York: Adama Books. Davis, Mike (1986) Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the US Working Class. London: Verso.
第4週	2012/10/01	文化主義的觀點(I) *Thompson, E. P. (1990) The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin. pp. 8-16; 59-110. Kaye, Harvey J. and Keith McClelland (1990) (eds.) E. P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Steinberg, Marc W. (1997) “‘A Way of Struggle’: Reformations and Affirmations of E. P. Thompsons’s Class Analysis in the Light of Postmodern Language.” British Journal of Sociology 48: 472-492. Thompson, E. P. (1978) The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review.
第5週	2012/10/08	文化主義的觀點(II) Somers, Margaret R. (1997) “Deconstructing and Reconstructing Class Formation Theory: Narrativity, Relational Analysis, and Social Theory.” Pp. 73-106, in Reworking Class, ed. by John R. Hall. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Steinberg, Marc (1999) “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinner.” American Journal of Sociology 105(3): 736-780. Jones, Gareth Stedman (1983) Languages of Class: Studies in English Working Class History, 1832-1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Joyce, Patrick (1991) Visions of the People: Industrial England and the Question of Class, 1848-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
第6週	2012/10/15	後殖民研究的觀點 *Chakrabarty, Dipesh (1989) Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890-1940.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 65-154.
第7週	2012/10/22	理性選擇的觀點 *Przeworski, Adam (1985) Capitalism and Social Democracy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-5; 47-97. Przeworski, Adam and John Sprague (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
第8週	2012/10/29	歷史制度論的觀點 Haydu, Jeffrey (1998) “Workplace Governance, Class Formation and the New Institutionalism.” Mobilization: An International Journal 3: 69-88. Rothstein, Bo (1992) “Labor-Market Institutions and Working-Class Strength.” Pp. 33-56, Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, eds. by Sven Steimo et al.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. *Thelen, Kathleen (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skill in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier (1991) Shaping Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and the Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Mahoney, James and Dietrich Rueschemeyer (2003) (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
第9週	2012/11/05	黨國體制的與階級形構 *Walder, Andrew G.(1986) Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp.1-84. Burawoy, Michael and Janos Lukacs (1992) The Radiant Past: Ideology and Reality in Hungary’s Road to Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Haraszti, Miklos (1979) A Worker in a Workers’ State, trans. by Michael Wright. New York: Universe.
第10週	2012/11/12	性別與階級形構 *Lee, Ching Kwan (1998) Gender and the South China Miracle: Two Worlds of Factory Women. Berkeley, CA: California University Press, pp. 14-35; 109-159. Milkman, Ruth (1987) Gender at Work: The Dynamics of Job Segregation by Sex during World War II. Champagne, IL: University of Illinois Press. Ngai, Pun (2005) Made in China: Women Workers in a Global Workplace. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
第11週	2012/11/19	工人社區與階級形構 *Gould, Roger V. (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 1-31; 96-152. Aminzade, Ronald (1993) Ballots and Barricades: Class formation and Republican Politics in France, 1830-1871. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dawley, Alan (1976) Class and Community. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
第12週	2012/11/26	大眾文化與階級形構 *Cohen, Lizabeth (1991) Making a New Deal: Industrial Workers in Chicago, 1919-1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-158. Hoggart Richard (1971) The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working-class Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Willis, Paul (1977) Learning to Labor: How Working-class Kids Get Working-class Jobs. New York: Columbia Press.
第13週	2012/12/03	政治轉型下的階級形構 *Lee, Yoonkyung (2011) Militants or Partisans: Labor Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Keck, Margaret E (1992) The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Koo, Hagen (2001) Korean Workers: The Culture and Politics of Class Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Seidman, Gay (1994) Manufacturing Militance: Workers' Movements in Brazil and South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
第14週	2012/12/10	台灣的女工之階級形構 Kung, Lydia (1995) Factory Women in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 89-125. Arrigo, Linda (1985) “Economic and Political Control of Women Workers in Multinational Electronics Factory in Taiwan: Martial Law Coercion and World Market Uncertainty.” Contemporary Marxism 11: 77-95. *Gallin, Rita S. (1990) “Women and the Export Industry in Taiwan: The Muting of Class Consciousness.” Pp. 179-192, in Women Workers and Global Restructuring, ed. by Kathryn Ward. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
第15週	2012/12/17	台灣的「黑手變頭家」與階級形構 Shieh, Gwo-Shyong (1992) Boss’ Island: The Subcontracting Network and Micro-Entrepreneurship in Taiwan's Development. New York: Peter Lang. Stites, Richard W. (1985) “Industrial Work as an Entrepreneurial Strategy.” Modern China 11: 227-246. Gates, Hill (1996) China’s Motor: A Thousand Years of Petty Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Hsiung, Ping-chun (1996) Living Rooms as Factories: Class, Gender and the Satellite Factory in Taiwan. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
第16週	2012/12/24	台灣的國營事業勞工之階級形構(I) *Ho, Ming-sho (2012) Fractured Solidarity: Working-Class Formation in Taiwan’s State-owned Enterprises (1945-2012) (unpublished manuscript), Ch. 1-4. Deyo, Frederic C. (1989) Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Gates, Hill (1987) Chinese Working Class Lives: Getting by Taiwan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Hsiao, Hsin-huang Michael (1992) “The Labor Movement in Taiwan: A Retrospective and Prospective Look.” Pp. 151-168, in Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle, eds. by Dennis Fred Simon and Michael Y. M. Kau. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
第17週	2012/12/31	台灣的國營事業勞工之階級形構(II) *Ho, Ming-sho (2012) Fractured Solidarity: Working-Class Formation in Taiwan’s State-owned Enterprises (1945-2012) (unpublished manuscript), Ch. 5-7. Chiu, Yubin (2011) “Old Constraints and Future Possibilities in the Development of Taiwan’s Independent Labor Movement.” Capitalism, Nature and Socialism 22: 58-75. Chu, Jou-juo (2003) “Labor Militancy and Taiwan’s Export-led Industrialization.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 33: 18-36. Chu, Yin-wah (1996) “Democracy and Organized Labor in Taiwan: The 1986 Transition.” Asian Survey 36: 495-510.